[This message was posted by Dev Ashish of Lab49 <dash...@lab49.com> to the "Algorithmic Trading" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/31. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/0d0dbc7b - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
> Hello, > > I've been away from FIXatdl for a long time now but one of the original > ideas was to encourage the use of the algorithmic extension repeating > groups whereby all parameters are in the repeating group as opposed to > their own tag. > Thanks for the update, Zoltan. I'm not using repeatingGroups at the moment, so will treat fixTag as a required field. Another thing to clarify on MultipleStringValue_t: it seems that an EnumPair having wireValue with spaces in them are treated as valid. Won't this cause an issue when the values are concatenated with a space into the FIX message? Is this a case where "best practices" would inform the developer that spaces aren't valid? Thanks [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:unsubscribe+100932...@fixprotocol.org] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to fix-protocol@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fix-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
