[This message was posted by Dev Ashish of Lab49 <[email protected]> to the 
"Algorithmic Trading" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/31. 
You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/0d0dbc7b - 
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

> Hello,
> 
> I've been away from FIXatdl for a long time now but one of the original
> ideas was to encourage the use of the algorithmic extension repeating
> groups whereby all parameters are in the repeating group as opposed to
> their own tag.
> 

Thanks for the update, Zoltan.  I'm not using repeatingGroups at the moment, so 
will treat fixTag as a required field.

Another thing to clarify on MultipleStringValue_t: it seems that an EnumPair 
having wireValue with spaces in them are treated as valid. Won't this cause an 
issue when the values are concatenated with a space into the FIX message?  Is 
this a case where "best practices" would inform the developer that spaces 
aren't valid?

Thanks

[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

  • [FIX] Re: Parameter: fixT... 'Algorithmic Trading' forum at fixprotocol . org
    • [FIX] Re: Parameter:... 'Algorithmic Trading' forum at fixprotocol . org

Reply via email to