[This message was posted by Marc Battyani of HPC Platform 
<marc.batty...@hpcplatform.com> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/c644c633 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

Hi Dale,

This is a recurrent topic ;-)

I posted about this earlier and I still think it should be a mandatory 
attribute in the templates.

Proposal for a MaxLength string attribute:
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/702f62f0

maxLength attribute for strings and vectors:
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/e5c03358

Marc


> Continuing my suggestions for improving FAST...
> 
> Dynamic memory allocation can be a real performance killer. In C++ there
> are a number of techniques that can be used to avoid dynamic memory
> allocation or minimize its impact including keeping thread-specific
> memory pools and caching objects for re-use rather than deleteing/newing
> them, etc.
> 
> The one technique I would like to use, however, eliminates dynamic
> memory allocation altogether. That is preallocating space for the
> largest possible message. I have been able to use this with data feeds
> from particular sources to achieve some dramatic results. However, given
> the current definition of FAST templates there is no way to achieve
> these results in the general case, because there is no way to determine
> what "the largest possible message" is.
> 
> So my suggestion is add upper-bound information to field instructions
> that produce variable sized objects. In particular, the sequence,
> string, and byte vector instructions could have a bound="n" attribute
> that would be a commitment by the data source/template author that field
> being transmitted would never exceed 'n' elements. This information is
> often available to the data source/encoder. Making it available in the
> template would give the decoder the information it needs to avoid
> dynamic allocation in the general case.
> 
> Of course this would be an optional attribute with the default being
> that the number of elements is unbounded (or at least indeterminate.)
> 
> Dale
> --
> Principal Software Engineer Object Computing, Inc (www.ociweb.com) Lead
> Developer of the QuickFAST Open Source C++ implementation of the FAST
> protocol. (www.quickfast.org)


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:unsubscribe+100932...@fixprotocol.org]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to fix-proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
fix-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to