[This message was posted by Dmitry Freitor of <[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/51b3f661 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Robert, from my experience this is typically implemented on the session level, rather than per order. > The system we are developing has the default behavior of cancelling all > open orders on abnormal disconnect (any disconnection that is not > preceded by a logout message). There is some talk that it would be a > useful feature to allow clients to specify on a per order basis what > behavior they would like on abnormal disconnect. > > I have two questions. First, can anyone think why this would be a > terrible idea (allowing users to specify if an order persists or is > cancelled on abnormal disconnect)? And second, is there any field in the > NewOrderSingle message that might be pressed into service to accomplish > this goal, or would we have to use a non-standard, user defined field? > > Thanks! [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
