[This message was posted by Jim Northey of The LaSalle Technology Group <[email protected]> to the "FIXimate Enhancements" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/53. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/876bc249 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Eventually you are correct. Right now as we only have one session layer for FIX.5.0 through FIX.5.0SP2 - we have left the repository consolidated. If the only think today that can be used is FIXT.1.1+FIX.5.0, FIXT.1.1+FIX.5.0SP1, etc. Why separate the repository right now. However, FIXT.1.1 can be used to communicate other payload besides FIX so it needs to be represented stand alone. It looks like FIXT.1.2 will be released in the near future and then we have to resume the work we started on configuring a session layer plus a n application layer. > > Hi Jim, > > To complete this, should FIX.5.0SP2 NOT show [Logon]? > > As that is is session layer not application layer? > > Clive > > > Do you see why this is the correct behavior? Think about FIXT - it is the > > session layer only and is supposed to have no knowledge of the application > > layer. > > > > > > > http://fixprotocol.org/FIXimate3.0/en/FIX.5.0SP2/tag96.html > > > > > > shows [Email] [Logon] [News] [UserRequest] > > > > > > http://fixprotocol.org/FIXimate3.0/en/FIXT.1.1/tag96.html > > > > > > shows [Logon] only [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
