[This message was posted by Jim Northey of The LaSalle Technology Group 
<j...@lasalletech.com> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/e121a61b - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

We had the issue raised in the GExMC call today where a market place wants to 
assign an additional identifier to circumvent the issue of FIX UTCTimestamp 
field only having millisecond resolution.

It appears to me that the ISO 8601 standard(2004) and the W3C proposal that was 
submitted to ISO 8601 in 1997 – specifies that the second field is defined as 
ss.s (where .s is a fraction of a second).

We codified into FIX the use of three decimal places to represent millisecond: 
ss.mmm

But, my reading of the W3C and the ISO 8601:2004 standard does not specify the 
resolution of the decimal fraction.

“the number of seconds elapsed after the last full minute, with decimal parts 
of a second if necessary.” (Section 3.2.3, p. 10, ISO 8601:2004 standard).

>From my reading it seems like we could extend by counterparty agreement the 
>resolution of the UTCTimestamp to include additional resolution is 
>permissible. For instance we could extend the format by counterparty agreement 
>to: SS.mmmuuunnn (where m is milliseconds, u is microseconds, n-nanoseconds).

Would like to get others thoughts and opinions on this.


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:unsubscribe+100932...@fixprotocol.org]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to fix-proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
fix-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to