[This message was posted by Steve Wilkinson of Cornerstone Technology Limited 
<[email protected]> to the "Algorithmic Trading" discussion 
forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/31. You can reply to it on-line at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/9521cc7f - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

Zoltan,
Thanks for the feedback, and I appreciate the possible admin overhead.  Just to 
be clear, however, I am NOT proposing a register of algos, only a register of 
algo providers.  
Your point about use of the ISO standard for exchanges triggered a refinement 
on the original suggestion - instead of creating a register, how about we 
STRONGLY RECOMMEND that FIXatdl publishers include the first 4 characters of 
their ISO 9362 (aka BIC) code as the providerID?
(Obvious question - do all global algo providers have a BIC code?  My gut feel 
is yes, but maybe others can comment.)
Thx - Steve.
> Steve,
> 
> This is an interesting observation, likely born of a well thought out 
> implementation.
> 
> I must say that maintaining anything like this scares me a great deal.  
> Brings back bad memories of us trying to maintain a list of codes for 
> exchanges in FIX.4.2, which we then amended in the extension, and finally 
> abandoned by FIX.4.4 when we went with an ISO specification which even though 
> someone else now does the work of maintaining the data you are still 
> responsible for getting the latest data sets.
> 
> I find the algo space very competitive with people continuously inventing 
> ever so creative names to brand their products.  My only worry would be "Mary 
> and Larry's Brokerage" trying to publish their VWAP algo in a copycat fashion 
> as ML-VWAP in hopes that it may get confused with that of a bulge bracket 
> firm.  I do see the risk of the top 20 or so providers clashing as quite 
> small.
> 
> Perhaps an alternate solution would be to assign unique id's as you read 
> through the file and adding that to your identifier (Strategy/@providerID, 
> Strategy/@name) so that 1-ML-VWAP and 2-ML-VWAP could peacefully co-exist 
> should it arise in reality.
> 
> Just my thoughts...
> 
> Cheers,
> Zoltan


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to