[This message was posted by Natan Kugel of BGC Partners <[email protected]> to the "5.0 SP2 Feedback" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/121. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/c91e8b56 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Should we add AggressorIndicator [1057] to ExecAllocGrp to fit it in allocations? This information may have implications on commissions. It is more related to executions / trades and than orders / order types as depending on business there may be cases when portion of the order is executed as passive and another portion as an aggressor. Feedback is welcome. [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
