[This message was posted by Donnell Bell of ISE <[email protected]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/d9cf7ede - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Hi, I am attempting to add preliminary support for bit groups and noticed that within the latest version of the FAST 1.2 extension proposals, it is not specified whether or not a bit group field supports a presence attribute. Are presence attributes supported for bit groups? Also, the bit group proposal implies that the bit group field does support (some) field operators as a copy operator is present within the syntax examples. If field operators are supported as well as a presence attribute, it seems like a NULL representation is required for bit groups. How should NULL be represented? Also, what is the interaction of the bit group's presence attribute and field operator, if any, with fields within the bit group? Thanks, Donnell Bell [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
