This message is from: "Tom Hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


----------
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: dry legs
> Date: Friday, February 19, 1999 1:23 AM
> 
> Good job again Dr. Jacobson.  I agree strongly!  Another veterinary
opinion
> and I could not agree more or have said it any better. Dr. Tom Hans
> ----------
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: dry legs
> > Date: Thursday, February 18, 1999 10:07 PM
> > 
> > This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > I'd like to make a point of clarification.  I'm afraid that Carol's
> > definition of "good" legs on a Fjord may be confusing or misleading for
> > some people.  Whether Fjords have "dry, clean legs" or not does depend
> > somewhat on parentage and conformation, but it has more to do with the
> > horse's physical condition (i.e. body fat percent) and body type.  If a
> > horse is in lean condition, his tendons are going to be more defined,
> > making one more likely to say he has "dry, clean legs".  On the other
> > hand, if that horse is slightly overweight, fat is going to fill in
> > around those tendons and joints, and they will not be as defined,
leading
> > someone to say the legs are not as dry and clean.  Believe me, there
are
> > 16 starved horses at our county fairgrounds right now that have the
> > driest, cleanest legs you have ever seen!  Also, when have you heard a
> > big draft horse described as having dry legs?  You may hear it
> > occasionally, but not very often.  And what are many Fjords?  Small
> > drafts.  
> > 
> > As an equine veterinarian, I palpate many horse's tendons, and I can
tell
> > you that, for the most part, a tendon is a tendon.  The most
superficial
> > of the flexor tendons that you can feel does have sharp edges, while
the
> > slightly deeper one has rounded edges.  If we could judge 20 horses'
> > legs, and then see all 20 horses' tendons laid out on a table, there's
> > not a single one of us who could accurately pick which tendons belonged
> > to which horse, no matter whether we had thought their legs were dry
and
> > clean, or spongy.
> > 
> > Like Carol, I have seen many Fjords, and I feel very comfortable saying
> > that, in general, the lighter bodied, slightly finer-boned Fjords would
> > be classified by many as having drier, cleaner legs than would the
> > intermediate body style or draft type Fjords.  But do the lighter
Fjords
> > have stronger, sounder legs?  No, not at all.  In fact, it's more
likely
> > the other way around.  To give an example with some of the horses that
> > Carol mentioned, in the pictures I have seen of BDF Torolf, he is very
> > lean and seems to be what most people would consider more the
> > finer-boned, riding type Fjord. Gjest, on the other hand, seems to be
> > more of the intermediate or all-purpose body type.  In the pictures I
> > have seen, one would not call Gjest's legs as dry and clean as
Torolf's. 
> > Does this mean Torolf's legs are any better or stronger or sounder than
> > Gjest's?  Not a bit.
> > 
> > So here's why I'm writing and making this distinction.  Fjords in this
> > country for the most part were historically the intermediate or draft
> > type.  More recently, the slightly finer body-type Fjord is gaining in
> > popularity, but I believe are still a minority as far as total Fjord
> > numbers go.  Also, many Fjords tend to be kept in slightly overweight
> > body condition.  So most Fjords will not fit Carol's definition of good
> > legs because their tendons and joints will not be sharply defined and
> > delineated.  Does this mean they have bad legs?  No.  On the other
hand,
> > does this mean I think "spongy" legs with no definition are better? 
No. 
> > As with many things, I believe moderation is the key; Somewhere in
> > between is best.  No one would argue that good, clean legs are
desirable,
> > but "dry"?  I'm not sure we need to go too far in that direction.
> > 
> > Brian Jacobsen, DVM
> > Norwegian Fjordhest Ranch
> > Salisbury, North Carolina
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >...To me describing a horse's legs as dry and hard means - not soft
and
> > spongy, which, unfortunately,  can be a characteristic of the
Fjordhorse.
> >  A characteristic good breeders everywhere are trying to eliminate. 
> > 
> > > When you feel a horse's legs and the tendon is really well defined,
and
> > feels a bit sharp, rather than soft and rounded. . . this is very good!

> > You should immediately be able to feel all the very distinct parts of
the
> > leg, rather than the tendon and canon melding into each other.  The leg
> > shouldn't feel fleshy.  Definitely not fleshy.--  That's what dry legs
> > are.   If the tendon is strong and "sharp", tight, and distinct, the
leg
> > is
> > considered "clean."  If you make a habit of feeling the legs of as many
> > horses as you come across, you'll begin to distinguish between the
good,
> > bad, and inbetween legs.
> > 
> > ___________________________________________________________________
> > You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> > Get completely free e-mail from Juno at
http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
> > or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Reply via email to