This message is from: Mike May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

At 12:25 PM 9/23/98 -0300, you wrote:
>This message is from: Arthur and Carol Rivoire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>This message is from Carol Rivoire at Beaver Dam Farm in Nova Scotia -
>
>Regarding comments to my message of today in which I suggested that our
>Registry, the NFHR, could be doing more for its memebers in the areas of
>EDUCATION & PROMOTION.  
>
>Mike May commented that I was confused in thinking that the NFHR ran the
>shows.  --  Yes, that's possible.  However, I feel that whether or not the
>registry is actually running the BREED SHOWS across the country, it should,
>as the governing body of the Norwegian Fjord breed,  have a 
>positive influence. . . A GUIDING INFLUENCE . . . on the standards of the
>show.  For example - All horses should  be pure-bred Fjords and registered
>with an approved registry.  -  All horses must be properly presented (manes
>cut, clean, groomed) - No abusive handling of horses -
>No unsafe equipment allowed - Horses and handlers tacked and dressed
>appropriately. Those are just my preliminary thoughts that could be used as
>guidlines from the NFHR to the BREED SHOW organizers.  --  This comes under
>the heading of EDUCATION. --  Also, I understood at the Libby Annual
>Meeting that all the shows, except Libby, were NFHR sanctioned.  
>
Well I am not sure what "NFHR sanctioned" means really.  I do know that the
Woodstock show is only open to NFHR registered horses or horses registered
with
a Foreign Registry.    This allows our Canadian registered neighbors to show
also.  The Blue Earth show as far as I know will allow any registered Fjord to
show.  I know Libby's is open to amy of the Registries.  I am not even sure
that they require the horses to be registered.  I have never been to or know
anything about the Turlock show.  But it is also a combined show with the
Icelandics I believe.  I wish it were actually possible for us to have as much
power as you think we do.  I do agree that we should make suggestion to the
show organisers.  We however can't force them to follow any of them.  

A possibility could be that if we did give each of the shows a to be
determined
amount of money to hold the show if they followed our guidelines.

As to the statement above:

 >For example - All horses should  be pure-bred Fjords and registered
>with an approved registry.

Approved by who?  The show organiser of the NFHR?  

>
>So, how could the NFHR help its members show appropriately?  Well, it could
>publish EDUCATIONAL pamphlets informing newcomers to the breed, and to
>showing, just what is expected at open shows and at breed shows.  That
>would be just one of the EDUCATIONAL  pamphlets the breed could publish.  
>Another could be on proper GROOMING.   Another on proper FEEDING.  On basic
>HEALTH CARE -  FOOT CARE  -  WORMING - VACCINATIONS  

I think these all are good ideas.  But other than maybe Grooming & Feeding is
it really any different than any other breed?  Worming & Vaccinations can also
be a bit specific to different areas of the country.  But I do agree with the
concept.  Now all we need is the volunteer(s) to write them up and get some
pictures to go with them.  I can't speak for the BOD but I am pretty sure
something like this would not have a problem with funding.

>- Lists could be made
>available of books and videos and magazines helpful to Fjordowners.These
>suggestions would be so simple to implement, and not very costly.  And
>before the directors start decrying cost ----- 
>
Well since the only book I know of written in English anyways is yours I think
we have a pretty short list.  In fact I can keep that list in the back of my
head.  I have sent people looking for books your way Carol.  


>I have one more thing to say today -  Steve mentioned that it was too bad
>all the DIRECTORS OF THE NFHR are not on the List.  Well, I guess! 
>  BUT, WHY AREN'T THEY?  This is the information age, afterall, and what
>better way is there for the Directors to know what  owners and breeders are
>thinking than for them to tune into the exchange of information and ideas
>this List generates?  It should be REQUIRED READING for NFHR directors!   
>
Well I just found out last night that Stoors Bishop now has a PC.  It isn't
hooked up yet but it will be soon.  Now all we have to do is get him on the
Net.  As of right now the following BOD members have email:

Catherine Lindsay
Julie Will
Keith Brighton
Marcy Baer
Roger Cabic
Susan Davies
Lindsay Sweeney

That is 7 out of 9 & Storrs is about to join us.  Now we have to get them to
join the list.  So far Julie & Marcy Baer are on it.  I will send all of the
rest of them the instructions for joining the list.

Mike

Reply via email to