--- Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 16:56, Josh Coalson wrote: > > I mean). FLAC only supports 8 channels, but I would bet that > > the compression would be a lot better if you separated the 300 > > channels stream into several streams (<=8 channels each) and > > compressed them with FLAC. That may not be practical for your > > application. > > Hmm, I just acquired some data that has 2 gates and 4 channels (for 8 > independent channels), and shorten still beat flac. > > skiymet:/tmp>ll really* > -rw-r--r-- 1 radar wheel 516384 Nov 20 07:43 reallyraw > -rw-r--r-- 1 radar wheel 195712 Nov 20 07:43 reallyraw.flac-8chn > -rw-r--r-- 1 radar wheel 193049 Nov 20 07:44 reallyraw.short.8 > > Weird!
Interesting, do you have a place to host these files (or another representative small sample)? I'd like see where the difference is coming from. Josh __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flac-dev
