On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:39:40AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > 2. The core libraries would become BSD-licensed. I've been really > 50/50 on this ever since I submitted the question to Slashdot > (see http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/27/1650256 ). > Now that WMA lossless is out it seems like less of an issue but > I will still need to get permission from some of you, those that > have contributed legally-significant (in the U.S. I think that > means >10 lines of) code to libFLAC. Only the codec libraries > need to be BSD; the command-line tools and plugins would remain > GPL.
If it is going to happen, you will get my permission. > > 3. Operations would move from Sourceforge to Xiph. There are > pluses and minuses, actually not so much minuses as unknowns. > > These are the main changes that would happen. So I ask everyone, > especially libFLAC contributors, what do you think? I think it is a good idea. -- Miroslav Lichvar ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flac-dev
