--- Sander Roobol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:35:04AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > As for flac123, it would actually be nice to revive that, and at > > the same time migrate the plugins there (to flac-tools I mean, > > kind of like the separate vorbis packages libvorbis and > > vorbis-tools). It's all getting to be a little more that I can > > keep up with right now and most of the TODO items now are in the > > tools. > > That would be fine with me too. Maybe we should go one step further, > and > create a separate place for the plugins too, just like vorbis did: > flac > (libs only), flac-tools (flac, metaflac, flac123, more?), > flac-plugins > (xmms, winamp, etc).
good idea. > Related to this, how's the migration of the CVS repository to > Xiph.org > going? I guess it would be cool to put the flac-tools repository > there > too... (same for the flac-plugins repostory, if it would be created) the CVS move is on hold for now. the web site will probably move first; one of the Xiph guys is redoing the html. Josh __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online http://webhosting.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flac-dev
