On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Steven Richman wrote: > > And then you won't lose the stuff in the pregap on live CDs, and it also > > makes the storage and naming easier to deal with. > > Can you explain this to me? You don't actually lose the audio data, right, > just the structure of the CD (which can probably be captured with cue > files anyway)? I've ripped CDs with pregap audio before, and I'm pretty > sure it's not getting lost, but rather prepended to the rip of the > subsequent track.
I suppose whether the pregap is kept or not depends on the ripping Iapplication. f it rips from 0:00 in the track, you're going to lose it, otherwise you'll keep it. If you've kept it, I'd guess you could even concatenate all of your audio files and create a table of contents file for a DAO writer so that you wouldn't have the two-second gap between tracks, either. To me it sounds easier to go the other way around and just write a little utility to extract individual tracks from a file containing the entire CD and TOC. cjs -- Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flac-dev
