On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:59:17PM -0800, Stephen F. Booth wrote: > [...] > 'net.sourceforge.flac'. A standard UTI for application developers to > use would help alleviate any confusion and could also eliminate > potential sources of conflict in the UTI hierarchy. For example, I > have seen org.xiph.flac used.
I would suggest org.xiph.flac. At least if Josh really is intending to move hosting of more than the lists.... -r _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
