> Dave Yeo wrote:
>> Yes that makes sense. Requiring a C99 compliant compiler seems quite
reasonable.
> Well I'm actually going to be even more reasonable than that. The only
bits of C99 that flac will really require is header file
> with C99 standard width integers (int8_t, uint8_t, int16_t etc). Erik
I would recommend including with the distribution a file for windows
developers to use. It's fairly simple
/* since windows doesn't have stdint.h */
typedef unsigned __int64 uint64_t;
typedef unsigned __int32 uint32_t;
typedef unsigned __int16 uint16_t;
typedef unsigned __int8 uint8_t;
typedef __int64 int64_t;
typedef __int32 int32_t;
typedef __int16 int16_t;
typedef __int8 int8_t;
#if defined(_M_IX64)
typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
typedef __int128 int128_t;
#endif
_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
