Cristian Rodríguez wrote: > flac and metaflac do not use openSSL, only libFLAC does.
But flac and metaflac are GPL and link (possibly statically) to libFLAC. > Personally I don't see any technical reason to use a different library > other than politics and obscure potential license incompatibilities. A license incompatibility is a license incompatiility and you can't just cover your eyes and pretend it isn't there. For instance in Debian, there are numerous packages that have libreadline (GPL) support disabled because the package uses OpenSSL. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
