On 28.5.2013 21:06, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 28-05-13 19:38, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: >> I'm always interested in performance tests :). > In that case I hope you saw the previous one, because the decoding > speed-up was credited to be one of your patches, according to some > people over at HydrogenAudio: > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-March/003856.html > > Really, great stuff ;) > >> I think if you are setting CFLAGS you need to include also the >> optimizations flags, e.g. "-m32 -O3 -funroll-loops" to match the >> default CFLAGS. > Oh, I thought I was appending flags. Anyway, thanks, that solved the > problem. I didn't know compiler flags could make such an enormous > difference. It will take me a few hours to rerun the test however. > > _______________________________________________ > flac-dev mailing list > flac-dev@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev >
On Windows the 32-bit NASM enabled compiles are always fastest. If you can run 32-bit code on your Linux box you should compile with assembly optimizations. _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
