Here's the patch submit message for 4GB+ windows barrier. http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail//flac-dev/2013-March/003804.html
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-requ...@xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev@xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > flac-dev-requ...@xiph.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > flac-dev-ow...@xiph.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of flac-dev digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: (no subject) (Erik de Castro Lopo) > 2. Question from Argentina (Federico Miyara) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle...@mega-nerd.com> > To: flac-dev@xiph.org > Cc: > Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:52:38 +1000 > Subject: Re: [flac-dev] (no subject) > Janne Hyvärinen wrote: > > > On 10.6.2013 22:27, Marcus Johnson wrote: > > > Also, shouldn't the changelog feature the 4GB windows fix? I remember > > > reading about that bug fix at the start of 1.3.0, and I for one was > > > incredibly excited about it. > > > > > > if nobody remembers it I can try to hunt down that patch on the mail > list. > > > > > > > IMO it should have been mentioned and I voiced my opinion about this to > > Eric on IRC before the official announcement. > > At least it's mentioned in the news posting on Hydrogenaudio: > > http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=101082 > > If some provides the required text, I'm happy to update the changelog. > > Erik > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Erik de Castro Lopo > http://www.mega-nerd.com/ > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Federico Miyara <fmiy...@fceia.unr.edu.ar> > To: flac-dev@xiph.org > Cc: > Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:13:56 -0300 > Subject: [flac-dev] Question from Argentina > > Dear Friends, > > I am new to this mailing list. I am with the National University of > Rosario, Argentina, and I am writing a book on software-based acoustical > measurements, which includes a chapter on FLAC for archival and streaming > purposes from an remote embedded system including a sensor. > > I would like to ask why the seekpoint information in the seek table > metadata block reserves 64 bit for the number of first sample in target > frame and for the offset of the first byte of target frame. > > It seems to me a lot, since 2^64 = 1.84e+19, i.e., far more samples and > bytes than can be expected in any file... ever. > > Thank you in advance. > > Best regards, > > Federico Miyara > > > > _______________________________________________ > flac-dev mailing list > flac-dev@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev > >
_______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
