On 16/07/13 8:10 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Leigh Dyer wrote: > >> Certainly -- I've uploaded the analysis files for both the -6 and -7 >> encodes, in case you wanted to compare: >> >> http://wootangent.net/~lsd/blah/6.ana >> http://wootangent.net/~lsd/blah/7.ana >> >> The encode seems to proceed normally until 59% of the way through the >> file, but then it takes a couple of minutes to proceed through to 61% of >> the way through -- it's during this period that the file inflates up to >> 9GB in size. The last 39% or so of the encode proceeds normally, too. > > What happens if you top and tail the file from say 57% to 64% of > the file and try an encode that?
The first time I tried, the resulting file encoded just fine, but after trying a few more times, cutting at slightly different points, I was able to get a snippet of that section that exhibits the problem. This is short enough that I think I can link to it here: http://wootangent.net/~lsd/blah/snippet6.wav This results in a 4.1GB file when encoded with -7. Thanks Leigh _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev