Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > It looks like I applied the the part1 patch and didn't apply the > part2 patch. > > Please check commit 99d5154f436b389758d6a9020e448b8dbedb14bc. >
Well, it's part2 as far as i can see... My message contained 2 attached files: 1) cpu_part1.patch that begins with diff --git a/src/libFLAC/cpu.c b/src/libFLAC/cpu.c index 43592ad..ec390d5 100644 --- a/src/libFLAC/cpu.c +++ b/src/libFLAC/cpu.c @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static const unsigned FLAC__CPUINFO_IA32_CPUID_EXTENDED_AMD_EXTMMX = 0x00400000; # define USE_TRY_CATCH_FLAVOR /* sigill_handler flavor resulted in several crash reports on win32 */ # ifdef USE_TRY_CATCH_FLAVOR # else - LONG CALLBACK sigill_handler_sse_os(EXCEPTION_POINTERS *ep) + LONG WINAPI sigill_handler_sse_os(EXCEPTION_POINTERS *ep) 2) and cpu_part2.patch that begins with diff --git a/src/libFLAC/cpu.c b/src/libFLAC/cpu.c index ec390d5..df97789 100644 --- a/src/libFLAC/cpu.c +++ b/src/libFLAC/cpu.c @@ -151,6 +151,23 @@ static const unsigned FLAC__CPUINFO_IA32_CPUID_EXTENDED_AMD_EXTMMX = 0x00400000; return EXCEPTION_CONTINUE_SEARCH; } # endif +# elif defined(_WIN32) && defined(__GNUC__) +# undef USE_FXSR_FLAVOR +# ifdef USE_FXSR_FLAVOR _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev