Brian Willoughby wrote: > I agree with Miroslav. It is a good practice to make a security release > on a "branch" of the stable, shipped code, so that people can obtain the > security fix with minimal risk to other changes. Even if the new code > passes all tests fairly soon, it wouldn't hurt to have a couple of releases > - one purely for security, the next with new changes in other areas.
I would agree if FLAC was under active new development. However, its not. Apart from Martin's apodization window work, its been maintenance, cleanups and performance improvements. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
