Brian Willoughby wrote:

> I agree with Miroslav. It is a good practice to make a security release
> on a "branch" of the stable, shipped code, so that people can obtain the
> security fix with minimal risk to other changes. Even if the new code
> passes all tests fairly soon, it wouldn't hurt to have a couple of releases
> - one purely for security, the next with new changes in other areas.

I would agree if FLAC was under active new development. However, its not.
Apart from Martin's apodization window work, its been maintenance, cleanups
and performance improvements.

Erik
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Reply via email to