Thomas Zander wrote: > If you want to share the patch, I am happy to repeat some testing on > Sandy Bridge and Core2 with clang.
The patch changes many files, libFLAC/bitwriter.c and test_libFLAC/bitwriter.c among them. So now I wait for the decision for patches #3 and #4 that I posted yesterday. > The slower decoding speed for 24 bit content on x86_64 seems > surprising, but minor. > However losing 15% decoding speed on i386 would be very bad. So, does it make sense to #define FLAC__BYTES_PER_WORD (in bitreader.c) as 4 for 32-bit and as 8 for 64-bit targets? _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev