lvqcl wrote: > But the 1st patch ('1_sources.patch' file) was not applied...
When I tried apply that patch, all but one hunk succeeded. I inspected the rejected part, but that seemed to have already been applied. > Before this set of 4 patches, I posted a patch that tries to prevent > unnecessary > inclusion of windows.h -- 'use_winapi_macro.patch' file from > <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2016-February/005856.html> message. That is that not this commit? commit a5c8e8e14de182c4e8c5a8cd0b6be7c75ab6f021 Author: Erik de Castro Lopo <er...@mega-nerd.com> Date: Thu Feb 4 13:42:33 2016 +1100 src/share/utf8/utf8.c: Windows API usage fixes Patch-from: <lvqcl.m...@gmail.com> > '1_sources.patch' was made after it, and as a result 'use_winapi_macro.patch' > must be applied before it. If you object to that patch, I can make version of > '1_sources.patch' that is based on the current code. Lets just get a patch that fixes what we have now. Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev