On 01/14/17 05:23 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
The `unsigned long` type should be synonymous with `uint64_t` so using `uint64_t` should be safe. Furthermore if they aren't synonymous we *want* that to be a compile error!
DOSish systems seem to use long for 32bit types and long long for 64 bit types, at least when targeting 16 bit (int is 16 bit) or 32 bit (int is 32 bits) systems. Long would be 64bits on a 64 bit system.
Best to just stay with the *_t types. Dave _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
