Hi Ruud van Asseldonk, > On Jun 11, 2017, at 7:24 AM, Ruud van Asseldonk <d...@veniogames.com> wrote: > >>> I'm jumping in on this thread to make a few remarks about the spec. I >>> implemented a FLAC decoder by only looking at the spec, and I have a few >>> notes that would have saved me a lot of time if the spec had mentioned >>> them. They are obvious in hindsight, of course. >>> >>> * If the channel assignment includes a difference channel, then the >>> subframe for that channel has one extra bit per sample in order to >>> encode the difference. >>> >>> * The number of bits per sample for a subframe, is the number of bits >>> per sample of the frame, minus the number of wasted bits per sample of >>> the subframe (and possibly plus one for a difference channel). >>> >>> I hope this helps future implementers. >> >> I would love to see a patch against the documentation for this. >> >> Erik > > Here you go. > > Kind regards, > > Ruud van Asseldonk > <0001-doc-Add-notes-about-subframe-sample-size.patch>_______________________________________________
Do you mind to submit this patch as well to cel...@ietf.org <mailto:cel...@ietf.org> (info at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>). That working group is currently working on the Flac format documentation in https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown <https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown> and https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/cellar/documents/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/cellar/documents/>. Dave Rice
_______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
