Hello,
Different how? When displaying the wave in Cool Edit (it's to say, the FLAC
file itself is opened and decoded through the Chapman filter), the audio
wave result shows little differences : changes in frequencies at a given
time, lower or higher; not many changes, but changes! I attribute this to
the filter, because when decoding with your soft, already used for encoding,
no problem at all, the two waves are exactly identical, in Cool Edit, and
with a binary comparison tool like Windiff, Dos FC, or so...no difference at
all!!
Can you confirm this?
Didier
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:00 PM
Subject: Flac Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7
Send Flac mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Flac digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: James Chapman Flac 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool Edit Pro v2
(Josh Coalson)
2. Re: flac files (Richard)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:22:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Josh Coalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Flac] James Chapman Flac 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool Edit
Pro v2
To: Didier Eggerickx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
--- Didier Eggerickx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Paranoïac? Maybe... When encoding my files in FLAC, and using the
Verify option, I do a final test with Cool Edit Pro v2.0, which used
a flac.flt file created by James Chapman for Flac v 1.1.2.
The problem is that, when decoding a Flac file with the Josh Coalson
soft, I obtain the same file, in content in size than the original
WAV file, but when opening the FLAC file in Cool Edit (using thus
this file filter), the result is most of the time a little different
than the WAV (original or decoded) file. I say "most of the time"
because in two cases, it was also exactly the same. How can you
explain that?
I have the same problem with MP3, but MP3 is lossy, and I don't know
on which version of which encoder it is based, so, in this case, it's
more understanding...
Thanks for your answer,
different how? see also
http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#tools__wave_flac_wave
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:06:20 -0500
From: Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Flac] flac files
To: Mark Rudholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
simple, not everyone has a ipod of sorts...
and some of my friends just have a cd player..
that can play mp3 but not flac or ogg files..
Rich
On Monday 13 November 2006 2:27 pm, you wrote:
Now that that's hopefully clear, my question would be
"why do you want to do this?" Since CD-ROM discs aren't
very capacious and FLAC tends to yield only about a 2:1
compression ratio, it only halves the number of discs you'd
have to carry around. Players with internal disk or flash
memory can hold data equivalent to up to 100 CD-ROMs and
are far smaller than any CD player.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
End of Flac Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7
***********************************
_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
