Martin Leese wrote:
Linda Walsh <f...@tlinx.org> wrote:
...
    That brings up another question then... What is 'hi' (v. low?)...

Zero, or close to zero, is low.  12 is high.
----
They mention 32 as a top end, so maybe 12 isn't that slow?
I'm got encode times around 30-45 seconds on a 2 CPU machine,
which has fallen to about 10 secs/album on my current server @2.7Ghz
using ~1080% cpu...


Despite the title of -M, -m the one that is
exhaustive.  This is stated at:
http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation_tools_flac.html#flac_options_adaptive_mid_side
The documentation is so clear on music optimization progs...(Lame is about the same). Most people still think 320CBR is the best, though the authors have stated it is no better than -V0 and just wastes bits.


_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
Flac@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac

Reply via email to