You might want to send this to the flac-dev list too. This list is pretty quiet.

Op 12-01-15 om 00:12 schreef Rainer Rillke:
After compiling opusenc.js to JavaScript [1], now the flac tool is also available [2][3], too.

s/Check out/Clone/ https://github.com/Rillke/flac.js !

I am slightly nervous about its license, the GPL and what CloudFlare is doing: It's melting a lot of content together into one file and adding JavaScript that doesn't appear to be GPL or compatibly licensed -- by any chance, is there a possibility to get an exception (e.g. LGPL license) for JavaScript versions? It's also an issue to what happens in proprietary browsers, or more specifically in browsers with proprietary JavaScript VM, when they optimize code and insert custom assets. In theory, users of them can't abide with the licensing terms and use the tool online[5]. Advice welcome.

Another thing is the flac website[4] being GPL licensed, too. Of course one may quote from it; however things would be easier if it would be dual licensed, with something, say cc-by-sa 3.0 in addition.

Finally, thanks for the great free tools, Xiph.

-- Rillke

[1] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/2014-December/002824.html
[2] https://github.com/Rillke/flac.js
[3] https://blog.rillke.com/flac.js/
[4] https://xiph.org/flac/index.html
[5] http://stackoverflow.com/a/1239727/2683737


_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
Flac@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac

_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
Flac@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac

Reply via email to