David, I just have one question. Will the flex 2 client side tools allow me to connect to the old AMF servers. The docs *seem* to say no. If this is not your intent and if this is wrong, I apologize for any confusion I may have added to the situatuion.
Thanks Hank On 10/19/05, David Mendels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > This is a misunderstanding. Flex Enterprise Services includes the new > AMF gateway but I am sure the folks building OpenAMF or RubyAMF or etc > etc will at some point implement the new version. We have nothing > really against the open source projects. We are adding a lot of > functionality, performance, manageability to Flex Enterprise Services > and hope that will be valuable to people. But we aren't trying to > "kill" anything. The Open Source community may well compete with > Macromedia in some areas, but much more important we want a rich > ecosystem with a lot of tools that solve a lot of different needs from a > lot of different people and companies to make the Flash Platform > successful for more people. I hope instead of us focusing on "killing" > open source, or the open source community focusing on "killing" > Macromedia, both can look at how we all can add value to to the > community and leverage and extend each others work. > > Regards, > David > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > Of hank williams > > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 6:07 AM > > To: Flashcoders mailing list > > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Macromedia unveiling Flex > > 2andFlash9 :communicationor cacophony ? > > > > Well, paraphrasing from the manual. > > > > "AMF requires flex enterprise services". > > > > I have read the docs for this section pretty thoroughly for > > this section and it definitely says this. > > > > Now, obviously, the old AMF client side code can be ported to > > AS3, but MM has no intent of making it easy or giving it > > away. They make absolutely clear in the doc that AMF requires > > flex enterprise services. > > > > Regards > > Hank. > > > > On 10/19/05, Martin Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (except for the fact that they seem to be trying to kill > > > > open source remoting... damn cant they just compete on features!) > > > > > > Hank, i really dont think this is true. > > > > > > if you check the new docs you'll see that AMF is still in the new > > > player, BUT there is a new version of AMF (AMF3) which contains > > > improvements to the protocol. > > > > > > and like the old and new VM, the two AMF protocols can > > exist happily > > > side by side in the the new player. > > > > > > thats how it seems to me anyway. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > martin > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Flashcoders mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
