On 11/22/05, Theodore E Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Charles,
>
> Actually the AS3 language and 8.5 player are very mature and stable, and I
> would actually expect very few changes to the core prior to release. The
> key
> is that the Flex Framework development is dependent on AS3/AVM2 being rock
> solid. Changes to the low level AS3 bytecode and player would force lots
> of
> changes in the development of the higher level Flex Framework.
>
> AS3/AVM2 needed to be complete far in advance of the Flex Framework
> development for framework development, framework stability and framework
> testing.
>


Charles P. wrote:

> > Yeah, I would agree that jumping on the AS3 wagon would be a waste of
> > time.
>

Let me clarify this statement. In my personal opinion it would be a waste of
time to solely work in AS 3.0. Because it is in Alpha. I hope everyone
understands what and Alpha is. Alpha releases are builds that are not
complete. Meaning that not all features have been implemented. Beta is where
you have all major features implemented but have a any number of bugs,
performance, etc. to correct. As of yet I have not seen any communication
from Macromedia that indicates that the Framework is rock solid and that
only Flex Builder is the Alpha product.

With that said, I return to my previous statement of not jumping on the AS
3.0 wagon fully but DO keep an eye on it (this means build little projects
to keep up with the new work flow and framework).

Charles P.
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Reply via email to