Perhaps "windows hardware" is a better term. You probably knew what i
meant.
My response was to someone claiming it was a good way to put 3d on the
web. If i had a GENERAL dislike of whatever the hell let you put 3d on a
screen i'd have bigger problems than sparkle. Hell i do C# at work, and
the component architecture and just generally getting stuff up quick is
very impressive. MS *know* dev tools, thats got nothing to do with it.
If MS did a Visual Actionscript 3, i'd probably implode with joy.
My entire point is "cluttering the web is bad", can't believe you didn't
see that. Or perhaps you just havent read the entire thread i dunno :)
So to reiterate:
XAML as a web technology, and a platform dependent one at that, is bad.
XAML as a generic applications development tool is NOT bad.
- Andreas
ryanm wrote:
you mean intel chips? or the usual pc architecture?
things like phones and other mobile devices, non microsoft gaming
platforms for example.
I don't know, he said it, I was just responding to it. The quote was:
"As long as they use their tools, and make their customers conform to PC
hardware."
ryanm
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
--
- Andreas Rønning
---------------------------------------
Flash guy
Rayon Visual Concepts, Oslo, Norway
---------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
