yeah that quote was from probably the very first apeparance of amfphp way back when. There was also a quote somewhere (it used to be a link on the old amfphp.org site, but its not there anymore) saying somethign to that effect that macromedia 'was aware' about it but had no plans to do anything about it.
Also, I've heard of way more instances of people having issues trying to work with CF Remoting than with amfphp...espeically in these latest releases up to including 1.0, where Patrick Mineault (http://www.5etdemi.com/blog/) kicked a lot of ass reworkign and speeding up, and clearing up a lot of the formerly annoying issues. I've used it on a number of production sites and have never had an issue of it taking a crap on me, not even from the first early releases. On 1/26/06, Mike Mountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, but subtle. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > Of Mike Britton > > Sent: 26 January 2006 15:50 > > To: Flashcoders mailing list > > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Re: AMFPHP for commercial projects > > > > If that is their approach, it inhibits AMFPHP which is itself > > oppressive. > > > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
