I've stuck another example here: http://www.flashcool.com/blur.html On the pc, as Mike said, convolution is faster, but if you need more than a subtle blur may not be what's required.
On 1/30/06, Andreas Rønning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know which is faster; a blurring one-pass convolution filter > or a blurfilter? Or are they just 2 sides to the same story? I need a > high performance blur operation for depth of field.. _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders