> Well I can honestly say mine isn't working that way at all - 
> I have an empty MC, nested into a scaled MC, this is 
> contained within a holder mc.
> This swf is loaded into a container MC. localToGlobal gives 
> the correct coords for the 'unscaled' mc's.
> 
> container_mc.holder_mc.scaler_mc.point_mc
> 
> The code which works out the point locations is in the scope 
> of holder_mc. But as holder isn't scaled and loaded in at 0,0 
> it shouldn't make a blind bit of difference.
> 
> If I want to get the 'real' stage coord for point_mc then I 
> have to apply a scaler factor from it's _parent.
> 
> When I found this out It confused the hell out of me as 
> localToGlobal had never worked like that before - I just 
> assumed I'd never used it with anything scaled by hand before 
> and wrote that off as the reason.
> Now if what you're saying is true then it gets even more confusing.
> 


One difference may be that I'm actually attaching an MC to point MC and
trying to get it's coords? I bet when you attach an MC it doesn't
inherit the transform matrix info from its parent.

M
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

Reply via email to