Seriously.  Stop f**king around and get mProjector.  I have coded against
many wrappers and mProjector by far is the best experience, period.  From
how the API works to the elegant and clever way it handles the system tray
icon (best solution I've seen) and direct communication between multiple
Flash windows (some others make you use LocalConnection - blech), etc. etc.

http://www.screentime.com/software/mprojector/

Now, if it doesn't have a feature you really need, then I guess it's not
going to work for you and that's unfortunate.  You'll have to struggle with
another wrapper that does have the feature you need but is a pain to work
with and is unstable, inefficient, and a pain to code against - three things
mProjector is absolutely not.

I've written full-blown desktop applications in mProjector that have run for
weeks without being shut down without a single issue.

-Steven

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of Cedric Muller
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 11:49 PM
> To: Flashcoders mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Best SWF Wrapper
> 
> Normally, I am not always puking on software, but
> I confirm that Zinc is a bad idea and a bad solution....
> 
> Cédric Muller
> -------------------------------------
> b-tween | designContent
> http://www.b-tween.com
> 
> tél.   +41 22 328 8168
> 
> 
> > I faced similar issues with zinc
> >
> > ____________________________________
> > Thanks
> > Sumeet Basak
> > CTO
> > Renaissance Legal & Learning Systems Pvt. Ltd.
> > Cell: + 91 9223214301
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Ian  
> > Thomas
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:27 AM
> > To: Flashcoders mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Best SWF Wrapper
> >
> > I personally would avoid Zinc. Although we've used it successfully,
> > I've had two or three of their updates introduce bugs which 
> break our
> > products, and I've had to revert until a fix comes along. 
> The quality
> > control is just too shoddy.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > On 5/9/06, eric dolecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm looking for some opinions on the best SWF wrapper you 
> think is  
> >> out
> >> there. The ability to save out files (XML), perhaps 
> communicate with
> > dbases
> >> (local/online), etc.
> >>
> >> - e.dolecki
> > _______________________________________________
> > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> > To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> >
> > Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> > Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> > http://www.figleaf.com
> > http://training.figleaf.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> > To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> >
> > Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> > Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> > http://www.figleaf.com
> > http://training.figleaf.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> 
> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> http://www.figleaf.com
> http://training.figleaf.com

_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

Reply via email to