The tests i ran were something like this:
create an xml object
add a callback for its onData
30 times, get the same file from the server and get an average of the
time between the load() call and the onData invocation.
repeat for loadvars
compare results.
I've done tests against a server that might as well be called local, but
on average loadvars gave me around 20 ms, while xml gave me between 25
and 30.
I know loadvars extends object, wheras xml extends xmlNode which again
extends object, so i don't know.. I always thought all classes that load
content and have an onData event inherit the same functionality but
override on the onLoad...
- Andreas
Mike wrote:
That is really weird. One question--are the files being loaded the same
size? (Or, better yet, the same file.)
--
Mike Keesey
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Kremens
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 1:17 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Re: loadvars vs xml onData
Hi Stacey,
Check out the question:
"Anyone know why loadvars.onData gets results quicker than xml.onData"
He's comparing loadvars.onData with xml.onData - apples and apples, not
loadvars.onData with xml.onLoad.
It's a good question! I'd like to know....
Jim Kremens
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
