Hello :) in AS2 ... isn't the same bench in AS3 with E4X !
With my library and my custom JSON class... in AS2, SSAS, etc.. JSON is speed... very speed :) I don't use for my test the JSON library of adobe ? Now ... AMFPHP > XML ??? if you use class mapping in AMFPHP ... i think AMF protocol is speed no ? EKA+ :) 2006/11/23, Ben Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
JSON Speed? I haven't used it before so can only judge it by what I read on the web :) http://blogs.adobe.com/mikepotter/2006/07/php_and_flex_js.html -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of eka Sent: donderdag 23 november 2006 15:10 To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Q:JSON vs XML advantages Hello :) JSON is speed !! the xml parser is slow ! With JSON your objects are typed.. in XML all properties, attributes, are String values only. You can try to compare 2 big files in XML and JSON to see the difference :) For me JSON is good but EDEN is better ;) Eden is like JSON but you can instanciate your customs objects, securize the datas etc.... You can compare JSON and EDEN in my openSource framework : http://vegas.riaforge.org/ 1 - dowload with the zip or the SVN my framework 2 - install the src folder in flash in your ActionScript preference list. 3 - Try the example in VEGAS and this extension ASGard : (JSON) http://vegas.riaforge.org/index.cfm?event=page.svnbrowse&path=%2FAS2%2Ft runk%2Fbin%2Ftest%2Fvegas/string (EDEN) http://vegas.riaforge.org/index.cfm?event=page.svnbrowse&path=%2FAS2%2Ft runk%2Fbin%2Ftest%2Fasgard/net (Config tool with EDEN or JSON loader) http://vegas.riaforge.org/index.cfm?event=page.svnbrowse&path=%2FAS2%2Ft runk%2Fbin%2Ftest%2Fasgard/config (Localization tool with Eden or JSON loader) http://vegas.riaforge.org/index.cfm?event=page.svnbrowse&path=%2FAS2%2Ft runk%2Fbin%2Ftest%2Fasgard/system PS : all examples are in the AS2/trunk/bin/test/ directory EKA+ :) 2006/11/23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I know one of the advantages of the JSON format is easier to maintain > code, ie your config files can be essentially actionscript. > > But are there any oither advantages over XML? What about performance? > Does it 'parse' faster? > > Jim Bachalo > > [e] jbach at bitstream.ca > [c] 416.668.0034 > [w] www.bitstream.ca > -------------------------------------------- > "...all improvisation is life in search of a style." > - Bruce Mau,'LifeStyle' > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > To change your subscription options or search the archive: > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software > Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training > http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com _______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
_______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
