Hi, maybe a dumm question but would it be off limits to express this changing-behaviour in the interface? For example in such an object as you are describing, you could add a method setResizeBehaviour(r:ResizeBehaviorImpl) (in pseudo then). Then you can change a certain type of behavior at runtime and it is explicit in the interface. Assuming you don't want to use decorator that is. Or is this not done?
greetz JC On 1/30/07, T. Michael Keesey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/29/07, David Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > startObjectDrag triggered by obj_mc.onPress > checkForSnap triggered by setInterval or onEnterFrame type of event, > in this case onObjectDrag > stopObjectDrag triggered by obj_mc.onRelease This looks more like the Broadcaster pattern or the Event Dispatcher (a.k.a. Observer) pattern than Decorator. (Also, it might be better to tie checkForSnap to mouseMove.) Personally, I'm not a big fan of mix-ins because, well, they're kind of sloppy. They involve tinkering with stuff that should be off-limits (and is in AS3, I think). Using mix-ins, you could accidentally use a non-function as a function. That can't happen if you stick to strictly-typed programming. -- T. Michael Keesey _______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
_______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
