I am not sure whether it is a bug or by design, though.
var test0_str:String = "6.30000000000000e+51"; var n0:Number = parseFloat(test0_str); trace(n0); trace(n0 == (6.30000000000000e+51)); trace(n0-(6.30000000000000e+51)); // ActionScript 3.0 6.30000000000000e+51 false 1.32922799578491e+36 // ActionScrpt 2.0 6.3e+51 true 0 Decrease one digit: var test1_str:String = "6.3000000000000e+51"; var n1:Number = parseFloat(test1_str); trace(n1 == (6.3000000000000e+51)); trace(n1-(6.3000000000000e+51)); // ActionScript 3.0 true 0 _____ elibol wrote:
Those who are interested in helping me verify the problem can run this test in actionscript 2.0 and again in actionscript 3.0. var a:String = "6.30000000000000e+51"; var b:String = "23"; var c:Number = parseFloat(a)%parseFloat(b); trace(c); //outputs 7 in as3, and 18 in as2 trace(6.30000000000000e+51%23); // outputs 18 in both as2 and 3
Good luck, -- Fumio Nonaka mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FumioNonaka.com/ My books<http://www.FumioNonaka.com/Books/index.html> Flash community<http://F-site.org/> _______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
