sorry i missed that part, thanks benny:) On 8/20/07, Benny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As Benny said, "you dont need to", no i know! But appearantly it works > >different for fields than for methods. > It actually doesn't work *different* but it doesn't work *per design* for > fields. > The docs (see the link I provided) clearly state that it is only supported > with methods. There is no mention of that it should only work with > overridden methods but that's of course the logical place where you would > use super (and of course in the constructor). > > - Benny > > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > To change your subscription options or search the archive: > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software > Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training > http://www.figleaf.com > http://training.figleaf.com > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
