Hi folks, I was wondering about your personal/professional preference regarding the following.
Say you have an interface IEvent and a base class Event which implements IEvent. Now you are creating an event subclass MyEvent which can: - implement IEvent - extend Event - both In other words, would you when choosing to extend Event still declare it as an implementation of IEvent for the sake of readability: class MyEvent extends Event implements IEvent OR simply class MyEvent extends Event I see pro's and con's to the both of them, but I guess I'm looking to see if there is some sort of 'why declaring blablahb is evil'. I guess I'm used to adding the implements clause as well, since it allows me to change the superclass and testing whether I still adhere to the required interface by compiling that class instead of compiling any source that uses it. In addition I hope it prevents people from declaring variables like var a:Event instead var a:IEvent... tnx in advance. JC _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
