Likewise (I seem to keep saying this) I have had a number of serious problems with Zinc over the years, and our company has had to migrate away from it.
Ian On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Muzak <p.ginnebe...@telenet.be> wrote: > Careful with buying Zinc if you don't already have a license. > As of late, their support is non existing. They haven't responded in quite > some time on their support forums. > I've asked them (a month ago) about a (serious) bug that has been around > since August 2008 and haven't heard anything. > > Just a friendly warning :) > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glen Pike" <postmas...@glenpike.co.uk> > To: "Flash Coders List" <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:22 AM > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Projector "Serial Number" protection > > >> Hi, >> >> Cheers guys - Zinc looks quite sturdy and possibly a nice investment, >> depending on whether the (humanoid) client wants to go for something >> flexible. >> >> Found a few other products that let you bundle in serial protection - >> probably less flexible, but cheap - links for anyone interested. Comments >> welcome.. >> http://www.increditools.com/flash_exe_builder/features.php >> http://www.chameleonflash.com/index.html >> >> As for the robots - they can look after themselves - can't put serial >> numbering on an OS Linux app, so we have to resort to making the robots walk >> and fight their own battles :P >> >> Later >> >> Glen >> > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
