>> Suddenly >>"parsing a SWF" format means "supporting Flash 99.9%", as much as "other >>technology plays videos" means "Flash is dead".
Ha - so true! I'm sick of all the "HTML 5 will kill Flash" talk that only refers to video capabilities of each. True that Flash has thrived by providing most of the video content on the web these days, but it just makes people look shallow and naïve when they use video as the reason Flash will die. Jason Merrill Bank of America Global Learning Learning & Performance Soluions Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community and visit our Instructional Technology Design Blog (note: these are for Bank of America employees only) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zeh Fernando Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 11:40 AM To: Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] WIRED hates Flash No point. It's an interesting experiment I'm quite sure. But I guess in a world where people are impressed by acronyms being thrown around without regard for accuracy or fact-checking, it fits the bill perfectly. Suddenly "parsing a SWF" format means "supporting Flash 99.9%", as much as "other technology plays videos" means "Flash is dead". etc. Zeh On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Merrill, Jason < [email protected]> wrote: > I guess what's the point then? Just displaying cartoons so people don't > have to use the Flash player? Impressive technically, but nothing to be too > excited about regarding feasibility I suppose. > > > Jason Merrill > > Bank of America Global Learning > Learning & Performance Soluions > > Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community and visit our > Instructional Technology Design Blog > (note: these are for Bank of America employees only) > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Carl Welch > Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 11:19 AM > To: Flash Coders List > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] WIRED hates Flash > > I looked into it last night. It only handles frame based animation. oh > well. > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Merrill, Jason > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> I think apple store and adobe flash have big chance to be flipfloped > > anyway: > >>>http://paulirish.com/work/gordon/demos/ > > > > None of those samples worked for me on IE7. > > > > It's a great idea ,but I guess I'm skeptical of any Javascript engine > > being able to fully replicate all or even most the features of the Flash > > player. At least enough to have widespread adoption. Do you know what > > percentage of Flash player 10 features this is supposed to be able to > > handle? > > > > > > Jason Merrill > > > > Bank of America Global Learning > > Learning & Performance Soluions > > > > Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community and visit our > > Instructional Technology Design Blog > > (note: these are for Bank of America employees only) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > > > > -- > Carl Welch > http://www.carlwelch.com > 805.403.4819 > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
