The only reason for the naming convention was that it's a button and it
has simple behaviour / "presence".
Besides, packages make name collisions less likely and we don't import
flash.display.* here - that's for suckers ;)
But if any suckers turn up, I am armed with some nifty JSFL and FD's
search/replace facility.
Henrik Andersson wrote:
Glen Pike wrote:
It's a subclass of a subclass of Sprite, both of which are handrolled.
Sprite->SimpleButton->ComposeButton
You do realize that flash already has a class called SimpleButton,
right? It is far from impossible to make one with the same name, but
you are asking for name collisions.
I hope that you have a good reason for the name.
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
