Sorry - I am way new to 3.0 - this is code I am trying to convert to help me learn....
why would this not work: var pArray = new Array(........); pArray[0].gotoAndStop(2); or is there a better way to do it in 3.... Thanks ________________________________________ From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Glen Pike [g...@engineeredarts.co.uk] Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 11:15 AM To: Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] 2.0 => 3.0 Surely using dynamic instance names can be faster than using array lookup in some "instances"? For example, I have a number of movieclip classes, I don't want to extend their functionality by subclassing, so instead of adding an "id" property, I derive the id from the instance name - "btn_0", "btn_1", etc. Messy, but works in some instances and is a case of GTD, no? I may be wrong of course ;) > I am more concerned with people who insist on dynamic instance names > instead of arrays. > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
