Flash is great! Stage3D(GPU drivers starting from 2006), DirectX11 support, workers, FlasCC, PlayScript. DEAD? is it a joke right? 3 billion devices, 10 top games in facebook are on the flash technology. we develop project http://realaxy.com/start. Yes, I don't deny JS and Unity3D are great, but at first, please try to catch multiple keyboard press in JS in all browsers and then we can talk about "flash is dead". Unity3d? NO, Unity3D hasn't linux support, and 2% installs on Mac(see their official statistics) Today, only flash is great for AAA-projects, of course, if you want to make money.
2013/5/8 <flashcoders-requ...@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Send Flashcoders mailing list submissions to > flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > flashcoders-requ...@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > flashcoders-ow...@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Flashcoders digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Adobe Flash future (natalia Vikhtinskaya) > 2. Re: Adobe Flash future (C?dric Muller) > 3. Re: Adobe Flash future (Kevin Newman) > 4. RE: Adobe Flash future (Liu, Peter) > 5. Re: Adobe Flash future (Matt S.) > 6. Re: Adobe Flash future (Henrik Andersson) > 7. Re: Adobe Flash future (John R. Sweeney Jr.) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 17:40:58 +0300 > From: natalia Vikhtinskaya <natavi.m...@gmail.com> > Subject: [Flashcoders] Adobe Flash future > To: Flash Coders List <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Message-ID: > < > can6sgrh1g_k00ovumzv0gmyc5y06maswmr_agaara+gswpv...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi > What do you think about Flash technology in the near future? It is a > pity but it seems that almost all clients have no interest in Flash > projects. > Do you think Adobe Flash has no future? Where to move from Flash? > > Thanks > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 16:53:32 +0200 > From: C?dric Muller <flashco...@benga.li> > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Adobe Flash future > To: Flash Coders List <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Message-ID: <3c6e5d1b-dd54-45b3-8315-104b5f2ee...@benga.li> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Flash will be here for the years to come. Gladly, it isn't the sexy thing > where trendy buzzers are. So, there are less projects, but projects are > still flowing here, at least on the top high client part. > > I have no future, but Flash has one. Just look at all those HTML5 bad > designs ;) > > Le 8 mai 2013 à 16:40, natalia Vikhtinskaya a écrit : > > > Hi > > What do you think about Flash technology in the near future? It is a > > pity but it seems that almost all clients have no interest in Flash > > projects. > > Do you think Adobe Flash has no future? Where to move from Flash? > > > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 11:24:13 -0400 > From: Kevin Newman <capta...@unfocus.com> > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Adobe Flash future > To: Flash Coders List <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Message-ID: <518a6e1d.8060...@unfocus.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I think of Flash the way I think of Shockwave. There is still work out > there, but not much, and less every minute. > > Kevin N. > > > > On 5/8/13 10:40 AM, natalia Vikhtinskaya wrote: > > Hi > > What do you think about Flash technology in the near future? It is a > > pity but it seems that almost all clients have no interest in Flash > > projects. > > Do you think Adobe Flash has no future? Where to move from Flash? > > > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 15:30:01 +0000 > From: "Liu, Peter" <p...@geico.com> > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Adobe Flash future > To: Flash Coders List <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Message-ID: > <b350e5f8e502ea439d1899c16e66ec8d114b9...@r12k0698.geico.corp.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Why can't Adobe make HTML5 as one of the publishing options, then we can > continue to use Flash without the need to learn another program? > > -----Original Message----- > From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto: > flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Newman > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 11:24 AM > To: Flash Coders List > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Adobe Flash future > > I think of Flash the way I think of Shockwave. There is still work out > there, but not much, and less every minute. > > Kevin N. > > > > On 5/8/13 10:40 AM, natalia Vikhtinskaya wrote: > > Hi > > What do you think about Flash technology in the near future? It is a > > pity but it seems that almost all clients have no interest in Flash > > projects. > > Do you think Adobe Flash has no future? Where to move from Flash? > > > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > ==================== > This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this > email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please > destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 11:31:25 -0400 > From: "Matt S." <mattsp...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Adobe Flash future > To: Flash Coders List <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Message-ID: > < > caoxtctoqathuqcu6g9j1yusuhbepbuatim-d5do_5fpkjsu...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > It's effectively dead in the browser, except for some niche markets (game > dev, children's content, educational), but it will survive for a long time, > and has some potential in App and Game development across platforms. > > The real problem is that in the tech world, being perceived as last-years > technology — the stuff the Olds are using — is the kiss of death, even if > the technology itself still has a lot of potential. Even if you *can* do > something with Flash, many developers, especially younger ones, would > sooner cut their swiping finger off than consider using it or admit to > having used it if they did. I can't count the number of times I've heard > people apologize when presenting something that was built in Flash, as > though it were shameful or unprofessional. That kind of stigma is tough for > any technology to overcome. > > .m > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:40 AM, natalia Vikhtinskaya < > natavi.m...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi > > What do you think about Flash technology in the near future? It is a > > pity but it seems that almost all clients have no interest in Flash > > projects. > > Do you think Adobe Flash has no future? Where to move from Flash? > > > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 17:42:54 +0200 > From: Henrik Andersson <he...@henke37.cjb.net> > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Adobe Flash future > To: Flash Coders List <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Message-ID: <518a727e.9000...@henke37.cjb.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Liu, Peter skriver: > > Why can't Adobe make HTML5 as one of the publishing options, then we can > continue to use Flash without the need to learn another program? > > > > Because HTML5 doesn't do a good job at vector animation. The Flash > runtime is quite powerful. And it is difficult to replicate so much > work, even if you aren't aiming for content compatibility. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 10:52:03 -0500 > From: "John R. Sweeney Jr." <jr.swee...@comcast.net> > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Adobe Flash future > To: Flash Coders List <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Message-ID: <7ed6b33f-432f-4578-a903-11371e85e...@comcast.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > It's dead on the MOBILE browser. > > There are tons of sites still using the power of Flash. > > http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/best-flash-sites > > > > > John R. Sweeney Jr. > Senior Interactive Multimedia Developer > OnDemand Interactive Inc > Hoffman Estates, IL 60169 > > > > > On May 8, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Matt S. wrote: > > > It's effectively dead in the browser, > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > End of Flashcoders Digest, Vol 68, Issue 2 > ****************************************** > -- Sergey Gonchar, Realaxy LTD. www: http://gonchar.me/blog/ e-mail: unknownflas...@gmail.com https://twitter.com/UnknownFlasher <https://twitter.com/UnknownFlasher> _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
