On 06.01.2010 16:50, Michael Karcher wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 06.01.2010, 16:27 +0100 schrieb Michael Karcher: > >> Am Mittwoch, den 06.01.2010, 16:13 +0100 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: >> >>> +int serialport_discard_read(void) >>> >>> >> [...] but is there any reason not to use >> tcflush(sp_fd, TCIFLUSH); >> instead of this complicated function? >> >> OK, I think I got it. tcflush is or was broken on Windows. See for >> example http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-10/msg00797.html >> Maybe add a reference to cygwin as explanation? >> > Don't worry. They changed cygwin. See tcflush in > http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_serial.cc?rev=1.73&cvsroot=src > It maps to a native PurgeComm which is just fine. Thanks to patrickg for > the hint to recheck current code. > > So no need to not use tcflush here. >
Patrick, can you take care of this in your serial port patch? Thanks. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- Developer quote of the year: "We are juggling too many chainsaws and flaming arrows and tigers." _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
