--force may have been a good idea back when only developers were using
flashrom, but over the last few months I've seen too many people who
incorrectly believed that --force would solve anything.

One of the problems is that --force has multiple meanings:
- Force chip read by faking probe success.
- Force writing even if cbtable tells us that this is the wrong image
for this board.
- Force chip access even if the chip is bigger than max decode size for
the flash bus.
- Force erase even if erase is known bad.
- Force write even if write is known bad.
We should kill --force and replace it with explicit --force-erase or
--force-cbtable-mismatch or similar stuff, maybe -p internal:ignore_cbtable.

First step:
- Remove any suggestions to use --force for probe/read from flashrom output.
- Don't talk about "success" or "Found chip" if the chip is forced.

Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]>

Index: flashrom-forced_stupid/cli_classic.c
===================================================================
--- flashrom-forced_stupid/cli_classic.c        (Revision 992)
+++ flashrom-forced_stupid/cli_classic.c        (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -303,6 +303,18 @@
                cli_classic_usage(argv[0]);
        }
 
+       if (chip_to_probe) {
+               for (flash = flashchips; flash && flash->name; flash++)
+                       if (!strcmp(flash->name, chip_to_probe))
+                               break;
+               if (!flash || !flash->name) {
+                       fprintf(stderr, "Error: Unknown chip specified.\n");
+                       exit(1);
+               }
+               /* Clean up after the check. */
+               flash = NULL;
+       }
+               
        if (programmer_init()) {
                fprintf(stderr, "Error: Programmer initialization failed.\n");
                exit(1);
@@ -329,14 +341,10 @@
        } else if (!flashes[0]) {
                printf("No EEPROM/flash device found.\n");
                if (!force || !chip_to_probe) {
-                       printf("If you know which flash chip you have, and if 
this version of flashrom\n");
-                       printf("supports a similar flash chip, you can try to 
force read your chip. Run:\n");
-                       printf("flashrom -f -r -c similar_supported_flash_chip 
filename\n");
-                       printf("\n");
-                       printf("Note: flashrom can never write when the flash 
chip isn't found automatically.\n");
+                       printf("Note: flashrom can never write if the flash 
chip isn't found automatically.\n");
                }
                if (force && read_it && chip_to_probe) {
-                       printf("Force read (-f -r -c) requested, forcing chip 
probe success:\n");
+                       printf("Force read (-f -r -c) requested, pretending the 
chip is there:\n");
                        flashes[0] = probe_flash(flashchips, 1);
                        if (!flashes[0]) {
                                printf("flashrom does not support a flash chip 
named '%s'.\n", chip_to_probe);
Index: flashrom-forced_stupid/flashrom.c
===================================================================
--- flashrom-forced_stupid/flashrom.c   (Revision 992)
+++ flashrom-forced_stupid/flashrom.c   (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -924,7 +924,8 @@
        if (!flash || !flash->name)
                return NULL;
 
-       printf("Found chip \"%s %s\" (%d KB, %s) at physical address 0x%lx.\n",
+       printf("%s chip \"%s %s\" (%d KB, %s) at physical address 0x%lx.\n",
+              force ? "Assuming" : "Found",
               flash->vendor, flash->name, flash->total_size,
               flashbuses_to_text(flash->bustype), base);
 


-- 
http://www.hailfinger.org/


_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Reply via email to