Am Montag, den 07.06.2010, 03:22 +0200 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: > On 06.06.2010 15:40, Paul Menzel wrote: > > [ Please CC me, as I am not subscribed. ]
[ I am subscribed to [email protected] now. ] > > Am Sonntag, den 22.03.2009, 19:43 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel: > > > >> Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 02:29 +0800 schrieb FENG Yu Ning: > >> > >>> 2009/3/23 Paul Menzel <[email protected]>: > >>> > >> […] > >> > >>>> I tried flashrom with the different delays (10, 100, 1000, 10000, 40000 > >>>> all in us) afterwards, but the image did not differ. > >>>> > >>> How about probing? does auto-detect work now? > >>> > >> I am afraid it does not. > >> > > […] > > > > Currently I am having access to this machine again, so I tried with > > v0.9.2-r1033. Unfortunately I still cannot report success on > > auto-detection. > > > > flashrom v0.9.2-r1033 on Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (i686), built with libpci > > 3.1.7, GCC 4.4.4, little endian > > Initializing internal programmer > > No coreboot table found. > > DMI string system-manufacturer: "VIA Technologies, Inc." > > DMI string system-product-name: "VT8367-8235" > > DMI string system-version: " " > > DMI string baseboard-manufacturer: " " > > DMI string baseboard-product-name: "VT8367-8235" > > DMI string baseboard-version: " " > > DMI string chassis-type: "Desktop" > > > > Mh. So the DMI strings are completely useless. > > > > Found ITE Super I/O, id 8705 > > That's good. Really good. > > I just sent a patch titled "Add IT8705 autodetection" to the flashrom > list (you're in CC). Could you apply that patch against latest flashrom > from svn and test probing again? Yes it worked! I responded to your patch. Thanks! > Write might still fail (in fact, that's > pretty likely), but if detection works, this is a big step forward. > > > Found chipset "VIA VT8235", enabling flash write... chipset PCI ID is > > 1106:3177, OK. > > This chipset supports the following protocols: Non-SPI. > > SuperI/O ID 8705 is not on the controller list. > > [...] > > No EEPROM/flash device found. > > Should be fixed with my patch. Yes it is. See above. […] > > I am probably forced to do a BIOS upgrade on this board. Is there a > > chance I will be able to do this using flashrom? > > Yes, of course. I know, it was a stupid question. ;-) I also tried `-Vr` and the first line of the read image did not change though. But was expected, I guess. 0000000: 25e4 2d6c 6835 2d6f 2901 0000 0002 0000 %.-lh5-o)....... Thanks, Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
